AND Session 4:The Hazards of Either/Or Thinking
- There have been trends of the “latest and greatest” of styles, focus, what works, what doesn’t work in churches… When you don’t get the results you want, it doesn’t mean you move the target and bash the old… think ”reinvent” - the culture we live in is always changing… Yesterday may have been OK but today is a new day…
- “Missional Schmissional”
- “I haven’t met the pastor or church that is only about the weekend and getting a big crowd… I just haven’t met them… there has always been some element of missional in the attractional churches…”
- “Attractional Schmactional”- sometimes I just get tired of feeling like we’re only as good as our latest series, last year doesn’t matter, the feeling of performing, and the pressure of coming up with the next thing is tiring… sometimes we can get tired of those who take take take but never volunteer, give, or contribute in some way…
- About four years ago we stopped growing- it was very tough on staff, what were we doing wrong? We blamed each other, our programming, the people, the weather, you name it… We tried several different methods to make changes…
- More and more people feel like they have a good relationship with God without going to church… 40% may go to church in its current model, 60% will never come to “the box” (church)
- Just about every church in your community is saying “Come to us”…
- “I have shifted to a profound conviction that in our community- 60% will never step foot in our church..”
- It seemed we have two choices, pour all our resources in the shrinking 40%- those who may be open to going to church, OR scrap everything and shift focus to helping the growing 60% that they matter to God
- 3 things we know at Granger:
- We must begin reaching the 60%
- We must reach more of the 40%
- We must help the 40% reach “their” 60%
- The attractional “come to the box” model may be the most/best missional strategy to reach suburban America- that may be the method that best works for the 40%
- Past: Get the community into the church Future: Get the church into the community
- Past: Church largely defined by the weekend service Future: Church defined “where you are”
- Past: Primarily centralized, top-down structure Future: Infuse a decentralized, organic structure for quick growth
- Past: Tracked Attendance and giving Future: Tracking community impact and “loving others”
- Past: No designated giving Future: Lots of ways for people to give to your passion
- People more than ever want to see the impact of their giving, less trust in organizations
- Past: People come to the church building to do their ministry Future: Ministry isn’t confined to a building, it happens wherever you are
- Past: Buildings serve the church, the community is invited to join Future: Buildings serve the community- the congregation also meets there
- What if our building is no longer called Granger Community Church, renamed “Harbor Ridge”- the place you go for hope and healing… the moments of your greatest need (example only- idea of changing the purpose of the building called church to a community focus… help for finances, marriages, classes, etc.)
- This change is going to be “messy”- tension is the new order of the day…
- “What works and is needed in Granger, Indiana will be different than what happens in your community…”










